COURT AUDIO: MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial - Motions Hearing Day 2 PART 3
The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe
Tony Brueski
2.2 • 614 Ratings
🗓️ 21 March 2025
⏱️ 33 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
The final pretrial hearing took place before the murder retrial of Boston woman Karen Read. Her defense team had filed a motion to dismiss the case, citing what they described as "extraordinary governmental misconduct" by the prosecution.
Read had faced charges of second-degree murder and other offenses in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. He was found deceased in the snow outside a friend’s home after a night of drinking.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is a special report from True Crime Today and the Hidden Killers podcast. |
| 0:08.7 | Karen Reid back in court again today, and we're going to take you right there for all of the coverage of what's going on in that courtroom and the follow-ups with Judge Beverly Canone. |
| 0:21.2 | Let's go there right now. |
| 0:24.7 | The defense takes issue with Dr. Welcher providing an opinion that the lacerations and cuts |
| 0:31.8 | are consistent with the geometry and orientation of the right tail light. |
| 0:41.3 | There has been many claims about alternative sources, which the Carmel disagrees with, as to those abrasions. |
| 0:45.3 | But if you've seen the PowerPoint that's been presented and provided to the court |
| 0:49.3 | who will be presented to the jury, it shows the symmetry of the arm and the location of the arm, the height of the broken |
| 0:55.9 | taillight, and it shows, with great continuity, the height, location of that broken tail light and how |
| 1:09.4 | it relates to a bent arm. |
| 1:11.6 | And that is based on engineering, biomechanics. |
| 1:16.6 | The same things that ARCA employees, they just didn't do this. |
| 1:20.6 | And so that's not witness testimony. |
| 1:22.6 | That's not beyond the bounds of anything. |
| 1:24.6 | That is powerful evidence, and we intend to introduce that. |
| 1:30.4 | And then, as I mentioned, finally, the drop test. |
| 1:32.8 | This is the same information that ACRA proposes in their report. |
| 1:35.8 | For some reason, I don't think that was offered at evidence at trial, |
| 1:39.0 | but it's clearly within the bailiwick of this expert. |
| 1:43.9 | And so we will file on Monday a PowerPoint presentation, |
| 1:48.6 | redacting all the inadmissible parts of it, |
| 1:51.6 | which is witness statements, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

