You ready?

I was born ready.

Welcome to the Advisory Opinions Podcast, this is David French with Sarah Isker and my goodness

we have a packed Supreme Court pod today.

We have a case that we talked about before called Wooden that is about the Armed Career

Criminal Act and I promise you this is a fun discussion.

I think we spent half an hour 45 minutes just talking about all of the ways in which

you could approach that case the last time we talked about it.

Then we have Justice Thomas flexing his, I don't like section 230 muscles again in a

descental which unlike the term concurral which I coined last week is an actual word.

So we're going to talk about a descental, we're going to talk about the Supreme Court

refusal to hear the Cosby case and a package of Supreme Court cases and then finally if

we can get all through all of that in a decent amount of time we're going to talk about

Contangue Brown Jackson's most controversial case and I challenge you to stay awake during

our discussion of the difference between cause of action and jurisdiction which is pivotal

to the decision which also tells you why this is not that controversial of a case.

So Sarah, shall we start with Wooden?

I just want to remind people how this starts so a lawn is arguing this case and basically

gets the oral version of a law school exam.

So I'm going to quote here, scotus blogs take on the argument this was published in October.

If a streetlight is out and a person seizes on the darkness to commit a crime spree, does

she commit different crimes on different occasions?

...