So Michael Popoc, legal AF, do not be fooled by the 9-0 decision by the United States Supreme Court,

which found that a certain group of doctors who sued to stop the FDA from allowing

Mifapristone, one of two pills that are used in

medicated abortion, which are obtained by women through telehealth and through a

male order system. The fact that they found that those particular doctors didn't have standing to bring that lawsuit

should give cold comfort to everyone that cares about women's and reproductive rights

because all it is is an invitation for another group that does have an injury that does have standing to challenge this very same use in approval by the FDA of Miffa Pristone and have this right-wing

6-3 Supreme Court rule in yet another decision probably next term that it can't be used. Let me lay it all out for you now. I know the headline was a little

bit celebratory. Nine zero, we got nine zero, but when you really pull the pull back the curtain,

this is a harbinger for a potentially and a terrible

result in the future and we can look to Clarence Thomas in his concurrence of

course to see the makings. I see this as an invitation that the

six to three majority are saying, this was the wrong case, the wrong plaintiffs, but send us

the right case and the right plaintiffs, and we're willing

to restrict the right to use Miffa Pristone.

Because they never reached the substantive merits of the case, how Mifepristone and the FDA approval can operate in a world

where more than 12 states have outright banned a woman's right to choose.

How those two things work together, how you reconcile those two positions, that was never discussed because the Supreme Court punted and just said, we don't have the right case wrong plaintiffs or as Judge

Kavanaugh who wrote the majority decision well the 9 0 decision in

FDA versus the Alliance of Hippocratic Medicine.

I'm going to talk about them in a minute,

how that's really Hippocritical Medicine.

...