meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Constraining State Spending with TABOR

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 21 July 2010

⏱️ 12 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Wednesday, July 21st, 2010. I'm Caleb Brown.

0:09.4

The Taxpayers Bill of Rights, or Tabor, has a checkered past, but it's hard to doubt a strong tax

0:14.7

and spending limitation actually does limit state taxes and spending.

0:19.4

Colorado's limitation is back in effect, and in a world of tight budgets

0:23.5

Cato adjunct scholar Michael New believes it's time for states to again reconsider

0:28.0

a proven way to constrain government spending.

0:33.7

Tabor is Taxpayers Bill of Rights.

0:36.7

Taxpayers Bill of Rights is America's best and most effective fiscal limit that was actually enacted in 1992 in the great state of

0:45.5

Colorado and during the 90s it was a great success story that again it was a

0:51.0

most stringent fiscal limit that we had in place at the time.

0:54.8

And it had three features that made it effective.

0:57.7

Just some background, I mean, libertarians have tried in the past to enact a put effective

1:02.2

kind of fiscal limitations in place in many other states

1:05.1

and for the most part most researchers including me agree that most of these previous attempts

1:09.6

really didn't work well or really didn't work that well long term.

1:13.7

The Taxpayers Bill of Rights, however, three characteristics that made it unique.

1:17.2

The first characteristic was it set a low limit.

1:19.9

A lot of these 70s era limits just were set too high and didn't really constrain government much,

1:24.7

but the taxpayers' bill of rights said that revenue grow at inflation plus population.

1:28.9

That's a low limit, and that was one of the reasons why it was effective.

1:32.3

Another reason why it was effective is it was constitutional.

1:34.8

Many of the limits we have in place are statutory.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.