4.7 • 1.5K Ratings
🗓️ 13 August 2025
⏱️ 41 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
The “professional managerial class” has become a staple of political debate on the Left.
In this episode of Confronting Capitalism, Vivek Chibber explains why the “PMC” is better understood as a heterogeneous layer within capitalism rather than a distinct class, how and why the middle strata have expanded, and what has pushed so many professionals toward anti-capitalist politics. While skeptical of the PMC as a precise analytical category, Chibber argues that the term still captures something real about one of the most politically influential groups in modern America.
The latest issue of Catalyst is out, and you can subscribe for just $20 using the link below:
https://catalyst-journal.com/subscribe/?code=CONFRONTINGCAPITALISM
Confronting Capitalism with Vivek Chibber is produced by Catalyst: A Journal of Theory and Strategy, and published by Jacobin. Music by Zonkey.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Welcome to confronting capitalism. |
0:19.0 | I'm Melissa Nashek, and I'm here, as always, with Vivek Chipper, a professor of sociology at NYU and the editor of Catalyst, a journal of theory and strategy. How's it going, V? |
0:29.6 | It's going great, Melissa. Good to be back with you. Yeah, I'm really excited to be back and to talk about our topic today, which is the PMC, drum roll please, also known as the |
0:40.3 | professional managerial class. This was a concept that was really a big source of debate when I |
0:46.8 | joined the left. So it was pretty cool revisiting some old pieces and looking back at essays that I was reading at that time when I was participating |
0:57.9 | in these debates. |
0:59.7 | And I started, of course, with the essay that kind of kicked all this off, which was Barbara |
1:04.5 | and John Aaron Reich's 1977 essay, the Professional Managerial Class. |
1:10.6 | Looking back, especially on that essay, I think this |
1:13.4 | concept of the PMC is really important for a couple of reasons. On the one hand, I think it helps |
1:18.7 | this make sense of just what is going on in American politics and why there is so much contradiction |
1:25.3 | and so much activity that just seems irrational. |
1:28.9 | But on the other hand, I think it also serves as a really interesting example of how |
1:33.4 | concepts that have become very ideologically loaded and used differently by various intellectuals |
1:41.0 | can have a big impact on their political analysis. |
1:45.7 | Yeah, you know, it's a concept that's everywhere now in the rhetoric of the left, and it's really mostly the left that uses it. And it |
1:52.2 | has some purchase on actual strata within capitalism, but it also, I think, in some ways, |
2:00.6 | obscures important differences within |
2:03.1 | those strata. And those differences are important for politics. So I think both because |
2:08.6 | it's used so widely today and because it has its limits as well as its uses, it's good to try |
2:17.2 | to get some clarity on what the concept |
2:19.1 | means and how it might be politically relevant. Yeah, I agree. Maybe we should start with the |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in 23 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jacobin, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Jacobin and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.