How corrupt is our federal judiciary? A new study suggests more corrupt than you think.

In better news, a federal judge for the first time refuses to impose a strict punishment

on a January 6th protestor. You know why? He says, what did the BLM and Antifa writers get?

The rapper 50 Cent is moving to Texas and in his honor I've composed my own rap tune.

An activist Maria Bello who experienced socialism first-hand in Venezuela joins me.

We're going to talk about socialism and theory, versus socialism and practice.

This is the Dinesh D'Souza podcast.

America needs this voice. The times are crazy.

And a time of confusion, division and lies. We need a brave voice of reason, understanding and truth.

This is the Dinesh D'Souza podcast.

We have dismayingly seen the spread of corruption and so many of our basic institutions,

including trusted institutions that have now revealed themselves to be eroded from the inside

and particularly rotted at the top.

And as a disturbing new study, a detailed investigation by the Wall Street Journal,

which shows that over 130 federal judges have broken the law and violated ethics rules by doing what?

By ruling on cases in which they have a direct financial interest.

Wow. Now, federal judges are allowed to invest in companies that are allowed to own

stocks, but there are disclosure requirements for those possessions and federal judges are required to

recuse themselves when a case comes up where they have any financial interest whatsoever.

In fact, the ownership of a legal or equitable interest, however small, that's what the regulations say.

The journal looks at cases over a 10-year period, 2010 to 2020.

685 cases where judges refuse to recuse themselves.

...