CNBC Special: Tech Shock – March 10, 2022

Mad Money w/ Jim Cramer

CNBC

News, Investing, Business

4.3 • 4K Ratings

🗓️ 11 March 2022

⏱️ 45 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

While Cramer is off this week, CNBC’s Frank Holland examines tech stocks - once a safe-haven in volatility is now this year’s laggard. Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities and Kate Stockton, Founder of Fairlead Strategies, discuss opportunities in the space despite the carnage. Jim Cramer gives his take on whether the recent tech wreck looks like another dotcom bubble bursting. Plus, a Silicon Valley insider who says 2022 is already too risky. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	tonight on the CNBC special
0:02.0	hour stocks still closing
0:04.0	lower today despite staging a
0:06.0	massive rally off the lows of
0:08.0	the day and tech. Once a safe
0:10.0	haven in volatility now this
0:12.0	year's biggest lagger. The
0:14.0	Nasdaq losing ground more than
0:16.0	the Dow in the S&P in 2022 so
0:18.0	far at least tonight. We're
0:20.0	drilling down on the moves and
0:22.0	all the fallout ahead. You're
0:24.0	going to hear from one well known
0:26.0	analyst who spotted buying
0:28.0	opportunities despite the carnage
0:28.0	plus Jim Kramer. He gives his
0:30.0	take on whether the recent tech
0:32.0	wreck looks like other dot com
0:32.0	bubble bursting and the Silicon
0:34.0	Valley insider who says 2022
0:36.0	just already too risky for his
0:38.0	taste. Welcome everyone to
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from CNBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of CNBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.