I'm getting a bunch of lame takes, people who do not understand.

Like this guy at Mike, 902-55.

So, load management for the horse, no load management for the human.

Got it.

Great take, Mike.

Great comp, Mike.

They're exactly the same thing, Mike. And by exactly the same thing, Mike.

And by exactly the same thing, I mean, one thing has nothing to do with the other, Mike.

How are you going to make that comp?

Gambling with a horse's life.

And potentially a major, major, major financial investment. Because listen, there's the animal

and hopefully put the animal first, but don't get it twisted. All right, I made and lost a lot of money

in that game. It is a business. I'm not saying it's not a business. Some people treat it as a

business and the animals like widgets. Some people treat it as a business and the animals like widgets.

Some people treat it as a business and they love the animal.

I'm not saying it's not a business.

But we're talking about endangering the animal's life and maybe a potential multimillion

dollar investment.

That's not the same as some dude sitting out a back-to-back because it's a back-to-back.

That's not what that is when the player is fine.

Why are we doing this?

Not a good comp, Mike.

...