Classic Debate: The Allied bombing of German cities in World War II was unjustifiable

Intelligence Squared

Arts, News, Society & Culture, News Commentary

4.2 • 1.1K Ratings

🗓️ 16 August 2025

⏱️ 64 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

No one doubts the bravery of the thousands of men who flew and died in Bomber Command. The death rate was an appalling 44%. And yet until the opening of a monument in Green Park in 2012 they had received no official recognition, with many historians claiming that the offensive was immoral and unjustified. How can it be right, they argue, for the Allies to have deliberately targeted German cities causing the death of hundreds of thousands of civilians? Even on a strategic level the offensive failed to bring about the collapse of civilian morale that was its intention. Others, however, maintain that the attacks made a decisive contribution to the Allied victory. Vast numbers of German soldiers and planes were diverted from the eastern and western fronts, while Allied bombing attacks virtually destroyed the German air force, clearing the way for the invasion of the continent. Arguing for the motion were AC Grayling, philosopher and author of 'Among the Dead Cities: Is the Targeting of Civilians in War Ever Justified?'; and Richard Overy, Professor of history at Exeter University who has published extensively on World War II and air power in the 20th century. Arguing against them were Antony Beevor, award-winning historian and author of the No. 1 international bestseller 'The Second World War'; and Patrick Bishop, historian and author of 'Bomber Boys'. The debate was chaired by Jeremy O'Grady, Editor-in-chief of The Week magazine and co-founder of Intelligence Squared. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Hi, I'm Eman.
0:01.1	And I'm Taya.
0:01.8	Our podcast, Bread and Butter, is currently sponsored by Nationwide.
0:05.5	You know, we talk a lot about wins on Bread and Butter.
0:07.6	And this one? This one is major.
0:09.2	It's called the Nationwide fairer share.
0:11.6	And it's honestly something that has real impact.
0:14.1	Nationwide is given £100 to over 4 million of their eligible members.
0:18.2	That's people who have a current account plus either savings or a
0:21.3	mortgage with them. Simple. Why? Because they're not owned by shareholders. They're owned by their members. So when they do well, you do well. So we're thinking, if you were to receive £100 a day, no strings, what would you do with it? For some people, it'd be a buff. For others, it'd be a treat. You know what I love about this campaign? It's a moment. It's called Fairer Share Day and it's about celebrating people. Nationwide are literally putting money into their members' pockets. That's the kind of brand I want to see win. And they're winning. They're the witch, banking brand of the year 2025 for a reason. If you want to know more or think you might be eligible, search nationwide fairer share.
0:55.3	In terms of conditions apply, search nationwide fairer share, qualifying current account and savings
1:00.0	or mortgage were required on the 31st of March 2025. I've ruled out uni because I want to live at home.
1:06.3	I've ruled out uni because I want to earn money. I've ruled out uni because of my grades.
1:13.6	Study with the Open University and there's no need to rule out anything.
1:17.6	With our respected degrees, you can learn from home and work alongside study.
1:21.6	We're open to all.
1:23.6	Plus, you'll have the support of expert tutors.
1:25.6	So rethink your future with the degree you didn't think was possible.
1:30.5	The Open University.
1:32.1	The future is open.
1:33.8	Welcome to Intelligence Squared, where great minds meet.
1:37.7	Today we're bringing you a classic debate from 2012.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Intelligence Squared, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Intelligence Squared and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.