meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Take One Daf Yomi

Chullin 29 and 30 - Mishna Baby One More Time

Take One Daf Yomi

Tablet Magazine

Judaism, Religion & Spirituality

4.8565 Ratings

🗓️ 29 May 2026

⏱️ 6 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On today’s pages, Chullin 29 and 30, the rabbis wrestle with an odd question: why does the Mishna repeat a law we already learned only a few pages earlier? Their answer opens into a surprisingly modern meditation on distraction, memory, and the limits of human attention. In a world increasingly dominated by notifications, interruptions, and fractured concentration, the daf reminds us that repetition is not redundancy but mercy. What if reminders are not signs of weakness, but essential tools for living wisely? Listen and find out.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hey there and welcome back to Take One, the podcast that brings you just one necessary page of Chalmud each day. And today's pages,

0:22.8

Hulin 29 and 30, contain a bit of an oddity about them. A bit earlier, a few daphs ago,

0:30.1

you may remember, we learned that it was not necessary to fully cut the esophagus and the trachea

0:35.9

while performing a kosher shakita or slaughtering.

0:38.7

If the choket or slaughterer cut the majority of those simanim or marks in the animal's body,

0:44.1

it was enough.

0:45.4

And then comes the closing line of the Mishnah on our pages today and teaches us the same exact law again.

0:53.8

And this naturally baffled the rabbis.

0:56.8

Why would the Mishnah teach us the same exact thing twice?

1:01.3

Why would it repeat itself?

1:03.3

Rav Hushaya to the rescue.

1:05.5

Both, he argues, are necessary because one mention is here to teach us that this law is true in ordinary situations

1:12.8

of ritual slaughter and the other to teach us that this law is true specifically in

1:18.1

kudashim or ritual slaughter that is part of the sacrificial service in the temple

1:23.0

he gives us a pretty good and thorough explanation of his logic had the Mishnah only taught this law in the context of ordinary ritual slaughter, he argues,

1:32.8

we might have thought that it is only true when the point of the activity is to slaughter an animal for its meat.

1:39.3

Whereas, in the case of Kudashim, the slaughter was needed for the animal's blood.

1:43.5

And had the Mishna only taught this law in the context of Kodashim, the slaughter was needed for the animal's blood. And had the Mishnah only taught this law in the context of Kodashim,

1:47.4

we might have thought that only there do we need the majority of the Simanim

1:51.6

or the marks in the animal's body to be cut,

1:54.2

and that when we perform an ordinary slaughter, perhaps we could be looser.

1:59.5

To make sure we don't make any mistakes and cover all of our bases,

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 21 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tablet Magazine, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Tablet Magazine and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.