Chuck Todd delivers an analysis of the Virginia Supreme Court's decision tossing out the Democratic redistricting map — arguing Democrats pissed away enormous political capital for absolutely nothing and that the reaction on the left has been wildly out of proportion, treating the ruling like an election loss when it was actually a predictable consequence of trying to fight fire with fire. He notes that Democrats passed the Virginia map without ever bothering to figure out how the courts would rule, and that both Obama and Governor Spanberger spent serious political capital pushing a referendum that was always legally vulnerable. He pushes back hard on left-wing commentary framing the ruling as partisan: the Virginia Supreme Court isn't full of partisans — they're technocrats, and Democrats just spent years arguing for norms and process and then ignored norms and process. His central argument is that Democrats will never win a race to the bottom with Trump's GOP, that the "fight fire with fire" mentality is a huge strategic mistake, and that Democrats can absolutely win in newly created swing districts with the right candidates if they go back to persuading voters and building coalitions rather than treating voters as the problem. He argues that Democrats are still likely to win both the House and Senate in the midterms — proof that Trump has done nothing to improve the GOP's image and that the path back to a winning Democratic coalition is still wide open if the party chooses to take it. 

Finally, Chuck hops into the ToddCast Time Machine to revisit the Supreme Court’s Brown vs. Board of Education decision and explains that the courts have been forced to rule on major structural changes to American society when congress refuses to legislate. He also answers listeners’ questions in the “Ask Chuck” segment.

Try ShipStation free for 60 days with full access to all features, No credit card needed! Go to https://ShipStation.com and use code TODDCAST for 60 days for free!

Thank you Wildgrain for sponsoring. Visit http://wildgrain.com/TODDCAST and use the code "TODDCAST" at checkout to receive $30 off your first box PLUS free Croissants for life!

Link in bio or go to https://getsoul.com & enter code TODDCAST for 30% off your first order.

Timeline:

(Timestamps may vary based on advertisements)

00:00 Chuck Todd’s introduction

01:45 Democrats pissed away political capital in VA, then map was tossed

05:30 Reaction on the left to Virginia ruling has been like an election loss

07:00 It’s understandable that Democrats wanted to fight fire with fire

07:45 Democrats passed VA map without knowing how the courts would rule

08:30 Obama and Spanberger wasted political capital for nothing

09:45 Dems have argued for norms + process that court said they didn’t follow

10:30 Electing the judiciary is terrible for the rule of law

11:15 The VA Supreme Court aren’t partisans, they’re technocrats

12:30 Left wing commentary assumes it was a partisan decision… it wasn’t

14:00 Dem leadership in VA misled the party & the public on referendum

15:45 We still don’t know what the maps will look like in the south after redistricting

16:30 GOP has the redistricting advantage now, but courts may intervene

17:30 VA court may give courage to other courts to stop the gerrymandering

18:45 Democrats will never win a race to the bottom with Trump’s GOP

20:15 Democrats can win in newly created swing districts with right candidates

22:00 The “fight fire with fire” mentality is a huge mistake by the Dems

23:00 Democracy is eroded when both parties play scorched earth politics

24:15 Dems should be trying to persuade and coalition build

26:00 Republicans treat voters as the problem, Dems shouldn’t do the same

27:15 Dems want to be held to a higher standard, but don’t like it when they are

28:30 Dems did real damage to their credibility with Virginia redistricting

30:00 Trump has done nothing to improve the GOP’s image, Dems can still win

31:45 Democrats know what they’re against, but not what they’re for

33:30 Spanberger was put in an impossible position by her party

35:00 Spanberger knew that swing voters didn’t like the redistricting chaos

36:15 Dems practiced politics of addition under Obama, now in survival mode

37:45 Voters viewed the Democratic party as more principled, VA jeopardizes that

38:30 Dems still more likely to win both house and senate despite the ruling

42:15 ToddCast Time Machine - May 17th, 1954
43:00 Brown vs. Board was the court pushing back against a legal fiction
43:30 Plessy vs. Ferguson was the foundation for segregation
44:15 Segregation had to end via the courts, congress refused to end it
45:30 Southern Democrats held enormous power in the 50s
46:00 The system challenged by Brown had too much power in congress
46:45 The NAACP was chipping away at segregation one case at a time
47:30 The court needed a unanimous decision for Brown to have legitimacy
48:30 The US was championing freedom abroad while segregated at home
49:00 Without the cold war, we don’t desegregate or pass the Voting Rights Act
49:30 Court rules 9-0 on Brown, didn’t end segregation but delegitimized it
50:30 Southern politicians organized massive resistance
51:00 Federal troops sent into Little Rock to escort black students into school
51:45 Brown changed how Americans thought about the power of the court
52:30 Courts became more like political actors in decades after Brown
53:45 The ruling in Brown was definitive, its implementation was not
54:30 Ask Chuck
54:45 How much could voter suppression affect juiced Democratic turnout?
1:01:00 What if Trump never becomes a lame duck president?
1:05:30 Is gerrymandering creating better chances for moderates?
1:12:00 What are the most realistic options for scaling back entitlements?
1:17:15 Predictions for the political futures of Nikki Haley & Ron DeSantis?
1:23:15 Is there a scenario for a bipartisan impeachment to avoid bad pardons?
1:28:00 Greg Olsen was commencement speaker at Chuck’s daughters graduation
1:29:30 Thoughts on the NBA playoffs & NCAA tournament expansion

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.