meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Breakpoint

Children, the Church, and the Culture War

Breakpoint

Colson Center

Christianity, News Commentary, News, Religion & Spirituality

4.83.1K Ratings

🗓️ 6 July 2020

⏱️ 5 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

A few days ago, a colleague shared comments he and his wife get when people find out they have seven kids: “Are they all yours?” “Were they all planned?” “What are you, Mormon?” And, most awkward of all: “You know what causes that, right?”

This kind of reaction to large families, which I’ve gotten with only four kids, reveals the assumptions about children that largely go unquestioned in our culture, even in the Church.

It is widely assumed, for example, that children are a choice. This was not always so. The introduction of reliable contraception, especially the pill, made it possible to divorce the inherent connection between sex, marriage, and procreation.

The cultural journey through the sexual revolution went something like this: First, we wanted sex outside of marriage. That required having sex without the threat of babies. Then we wanted babies outside of marriage, and even today, babies without sex. Somewhere along the way, the idea of marriage without children, intentionally I mean, became common too. Even among Christian couples, the idea of not only delaying children but choosing to not have them at all is, in many circles, non-controversial.

In previous generations, an intentionally childless marriage would have been unthinkable. Infertility, as so many couples are painfully aware, is tragic. Intentional infertility is considered a choice today.

Another assumption that controls our cultural thinking is that we have children in order to fulfill adult longings. This shift goes hand in hand with seeing marriage as fundamentally an institution of adult happiness, rather than as an institution to protect and enable the next generation.

When kids are thought of in terms of personal fulfillments, how we go about “obtaining” them becomes less important. Or not at all. And so, the sexual revolution is punctuated by ethically problematic reproductive technologies and intentionally single-parent households, not to mention same-sex households who want children even after entering an intrinsically sterile sexual union.

In short, after seeking the moral acceptance of sex without marriage or sex without children for so long, we now seek moral acceptance of having children without marriage or even without sex. Left out of our moral calculations is what happens to children who primarily exist to fulfill adult longings.

We will soon know. According to a new report from the U.S. Census Bureau, America has gotten older faster over the last ten years than at any other time in history. Since 2010, Americans over 65 have become the fastest-growing segment of the population. Meanwhile, the number of those under 18 actually shrank between 2010 and 2019. If this continues, by 2035, senior citizens will outnumber minors in America in an unprecedented “top-heavy” arrangement with all sorts of social, economic, and political instability.

This news comes at a moment many Christians are already wondering what America their children will inherit. No matter what we do or how we vote or even who is appointed to the Supreme Court, it seems, our culture and country continue to drift in an anti-Christian direction.

In response to a recent disappointing opinion from the Supreme Court, Pastor Kevin DeYoung proposed a new “culture war strategy.” Writing at The Gospel Coalition, DeYoung urged Christians to “have more children and disciple them like crazy.” As my Tennessee friend might say, it’s not rocket-surgery.

The heated reactions to DeYoung’s blog post, especially from other Christians, shows just how counter-cultural it has become to embrace the inherent created connection between sex, marriage, and children, even within the Church.

Of course, the reason Christians of all people should welcome children into our lives and even into our troubled times is not ultimately to win a culture war.  As DeYoung acknowledged, children are a blessing from the Lord. Full stop. They aren’t means. They are ends: They are signs of living hope, votes of confidence in God’s sovereignty, and the most basic and constant opportunity to love others as Christ loves us.

Jesus told his disciples: “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.” Ours is a culture that hinders children, instead of welcoming them. That we look at God’s blessings as mere lifestyle choices, even as punchlines for wisecracks and mockery, marks that we are a dying culture. And maybe a dying Church.

Christians of all people should have no hesitation challenging our culture’s bad assumptions about children and welcoming them as blessings. But to do so, tragically, we’ll have to start with the household of God.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Telling Christians that they should consider having children, more children, and discipling them well?

0:05.9

Well, that shouldn't be a controversial thing.

0:08.0

For the Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street.

0:10.4

This is Breakpoint.

0:12.6

A few days ago, a colleague shared some comments that he and his wife get when people find out they have seven kids.

0:17.6

Are they all yours?

0:18.5

Were they all planned?

0:19.6

What are you Mormon?

0:20.6

Most awkward? You

0:21.7

know what causes that, right? That kind of reaction to large families, which, by the way, I've gotten

0:26.5

with only four kids, reveals the assumptions about children that go largely unquestioned in our

0:32.5

culture and even in our churches. It's widely assumed, for example, that children are a choice.

0:38.7

This was not always so. The introduction of reliable contraception, especially the pill,

0:43.9

made it possible to divorce the inherent connection between sex, marriage, and procreation.

0:48.9

The cultural journey through the sexual revolution went something like this.

0:53.4

First, we wanted to have sex outside of

0:55.2

marriage. That required being able to have sex without the threat of children. Then we wanted to have

1:00.0

babies outside of marriage be completely okay. And even today, babies without sex. Now, somewhere along

1:07.3

the way, the idea of marriage without children, intentionally, I mean,

1:11.4

became completely common as well.

1:13.5

Even among Christian couples, the idea of not only delaying children, but choosing to not have

1:17.9

them at all is in many circles non-controversial.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colson Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Colson Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.