meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Advisory Opinions

Chauvin’s Conviction and What's Next?

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch

News, Government, Politics

4.74K Ratings

🗓️ 22 April 2021

⏱️ 50 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today, David and Sarah give us their reactions to the Derek Chauvin trial verdict, talk about potential issues on appeal, and break down Minnesota state law on the competency of a juror as a witness. Also on today’s episode, our hosts chat about an interesting court filing involving Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and a talk about whether the law can or should protect employees from political discrimination. Show Notes: -Last week’s Advisory Opinions episode on the ins and outs of the Chauvin trial -Minnesota 606(b) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the Advisory Opinions Podcast. This is David French with Sarah Isger and we're

0:08.7

of course going to be talking about the Derek Chauvin verdict. We're also going to be talking about

0:16.4

a really interesting court filing in Texas that, um, Sarah might have highlighted a tiny bit of

0:26.8

hypocrisy by a politician. Can you imagine? It's, it's stunning. It's stunning. And we're also

0:34.6

going to be talking about if we've got time, an interesting question about can or should the law,

0:41.6

as our nation becomes more politically divided and as corporations become more politically engaged,

0:47.7

can or should the law protect employees from political discrimination? So we've kind of got three

0:55.4

big topics. But let's start with big topic number one. And Sarah, I just want to go to you for your,

1:03.7

you know, right off the bat about your reflection on the verdict itself and the reaction to the verdict.

1:11.8

I've got some thoughts on both, but kick us off.

1:17.5

So it's interesting like, you know, how there's these like, tell us your age without telling us your

1:21.3

age, the three events in my life where it's like, where were you when are the challenger explosion,

1:29.1

9-11 and the OJ Simpson verdict. And I think that one of my initial reactions when we heard

1:39.8

that the jury had reached a verdict was a, obviously, he's going to get convicted. Any jury that

1:44.9

comes back that quickly, it's very good sign for the prosecution. And B, I was a little surprised

1:54.6

that the judge didn't push the timing to the tomorrow morning. You know, that was really set to

2:02.2

happen. They said between 430 and 5, I was a little worried it would happen closer to 6. If, and

2:08.3

you know, the judge at that point does not know the verdict, if the verdict had gone the other way,

2:13.0

sort of the last thing you want is that coming out at 6 p.m. So those were some of my like initial

2:21.3

thoughts. Look, this looks really good for the prosecution, but also if it's for whatever reason,

2:25.6

not, this is not the ideal time of day. In fact, I had, we had a date night plan for like at least

2:34.9

a month, maybe over a month, to go to this restaurant downtown. And as soon as they said,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.