All right, we have something very serious to talk about. People online are at each other's

necks trying to figure out what the ideology was of Charlie Kirk's shooter. Now, of course,

we condemn it on this channel, but I think that really misses the point. At this point in time,

the ideology of the shooter is not as important. We are seeing a broader pattern pop up of

young males in particular being radicalized

online, using that radicalization to enact real world violence, and then it becomes a cyclical

pattern where people see it happen online and do it again. Like, did you guys know that as Charlie Kirk

was shot at Utah Valley University,

tragically, at the very same time, there was a school shooting going on in Colorado.

Now, the school shooter in Colorado has already been found. We know his motives. He was a far-right

anti-Semite. That was the school shooter in Colorado. The school shooter at Utah, or the person who killed Charlie Kirk, we still don't quite know

his exact motives.

They found bullet casings that said Bella chow, chow, chow.

It said something about a bulge.

It was like a sexual remark.

It had a meme about being gay.

And then it said, hey, fascist, catch this. Now, people online are debating a lot about this kid's ideology. There's a lot of disinformation going around. So I'd be very, very careful. Like, people thought that this person who donated to Trump in 2020 was him. But he would have actually been 17 at the time, and people found out this was a 40-year-old

man with the same name, Tyler Robinson. So no, 17-year-old Tyler Robinson did not donate to Trump.

That was separate, but there are still indications that his family was Republican-leaning,

but all evidence that we have from the official investigation that was released thus far

has memes on bullet

casings and anti-fascist writing. So the argument about that is really not worth having. What I do

...