Here in the United States, it appears that the media has fully turned on the CDC.

We've covered headlines over the past couple of weeks that really had us scratching our

heads and saying, wow, they're really going in on the CDC's data integrity, the fact

that they're not using science anymore, they've abandoned it.

And so here's a recent headline that came out.

It's just, it's coffeineels for the CDC.

CDC is refusing to publish data as collected on booster effectiveness for 33 million Americans

age 18 to 49 over fears it might show the vaccine is ineffective.

They also are not publishing data on child hospitalization rates or comorbidities, but

it says here in the article, Kristen Newdlin, a spokesperson for the CDC said the agency

has been slow to release the different streams of data because basically at the end of the

day, it's not yet ready for prime time.

Okay.

Well, let's just keep reading here. She also said that they were reluctant to publish

the data because it represents only 10% of the population in the United States accounting

for 33 million people.

The same sample size as CDC is used to track influenza for years.

And now, they'll hold on to your seat here.

This next quote may get you outrage scientists stressed that publishing the data went hand

in hand with educating the public about vaccines.

While the truth presented data said Dr. Paul Ophett, a vaccine expert and advisor to the

Putin drug administration.

...