One, one, one, that's a great,

I don't have a great, uh-huh.

H-huh.

You trying to be a street cop.

You trying to be a street cop.

Hey guys, welcome to this episode of Street Cop Training podcast and your host

founder and CEO Street Cop Training. My name is Dennis Benino and we're

bringing back today officially your case law shorts. Everybody asked me to do these. They really enjoy them. So this is

going to be a smaller portion of the podcast that I'm going to recite and go over

and explain case law for you to use in the field that'll help you in your profession.

Today's case law short is sponsored by Attorney Bridget Trucksillo from Lady Law Shield.

She's a labor attorney. You heard her on the podcast several times. People love her. If you've come to the conventions, our conferences, you have seen her in person. She is fantastic. She covers advice for I think all 50 states so if you want to call her and talk to her

she's willing to give you guys some of her time reach out to her Lady

Law Shield.com forward slash street cop for a special rate again

lady law shield dot com forward slash street cop so what better way to restart our case law shorts than to discuss the automobile

exception? So let's start with where it started. 1925 in a case called Carroll versus the United States.

In 1925, a decision by the US Supreme Court that

upheld the warrantless searches of automobiles, which is known as the automobile exception.

The case had also been cited as widening the scope of the search.

So here's the backgrounds.

During prohibition, officers arranged an undercover purchase of liquor from George Carroll,

an illicit dealer under investigation,

...