meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Street Cop Podcast

Case Law Short: United States v Johns (1985)

Street Cop Podcast

Street Cop Training

Education

4.9933 Ratings

🗓️ 9 January 2025

⏱️ 6 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this case law short episode of the Street Cop Podcast, Dennis Benigno, founder and CEO of Street Cop Training goes over United States v Johns (1985).

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

One-11. One-step.

0:01.5

You're trying to be a street cop.

0:10.6

Hey guys, welcome this episode of the Street Cop Training podcast.

0:12.7

My name is Dennis Benino.

0:15.5

And today I have something for you that you guys all love.

0:18.3

And it is a case law short.

0:20.0

Brought to you by lady law shield

0:21.2

com check out bridget truck sillo for all your wrongful termination lawsuit needs she's

0:26.4

really good she used to be a cop and guys if you're going through it at work and you think they're

0:30.2

doing something to harass you reach out to her get your ducks in a row get ready for it because

0:34.6

the last thing you want to do is get caught with your pants down and you don't know what to do in a situation where you've lost your job. She'll help you out.

0:41.0

Check her out, ladylawshield.com. And today we're going to talk about U.S. versus John's

0:44.9

1985, a really good one. And you're really going to find value in this one. This is a U.S.

0:49.3

Supreme Court case that addresses the constitutionality of a warrantless search of a vehicle under the Fourth Amendment,

0:55.2

specifically in the context of vehicle searches after a delay and the automobile exception.

1:00.7

So here's the case background. In this case, federal agents observed a truck being used to transport

1:04.8

drugs. After following the truck for several hours, the agents arrested the driver and pounded

1:09.2

the vehicle. The agents then waited several hours before conducting a warrantless search of the truck during which they discovered

1:14.5

drugs hidden in the vehicle. The question before the Supreme Court was whether the delay in conducting

1:18.7

the search violated the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures.

1:23.1

So the main issue was whether the warrantless search of the truck conducted several hours

1:27.3

after the vehicle been impounded violated the Fourth Amendment rights of the defendant.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Street Cop Training, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Street Cop Training and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.