meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Bribe, Swindle or Steal

Canada and the OECD Anti-bribery Convention

Bribe, Swindle or Steal

Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International

News, Business, Business News

4.9582 Ratings

🗓️ 2 February 2022

⏱️ 19 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Mark Morrison, National Practice Group Leader of Blakes' Business Crimes, Investigations & Compliance group, joins the podcast to discuss Canada's performance to date as a party to the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention and what the revised Recommendation might mean for Canada.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back to the podcast, bribe, swindle, or steel.

0:09.0

I'm Alexandra Rogge, and my guest today is Mark Morrison.

0:13.0

Mark is the National Practice Group leader of Blake's Business Crimes, Investigations, and Compliance Group.

0:19.0

He's one of the leading white-collar lawyers in Canada with a

0:21.9

particular focus on anti-corruption, and we're speaking today about Canada's performance as a

0:26.5

signatory to the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention and what the new recommendation came out in November

0:32.6

might mean for Canada. Thank you for joining me, Mark. Thanks very much for having me, Alexander.

0:38.3

Can you provide a bit of background on Canada's accession to the convention and just

0:43.9

your understanding as a practitioner in Canada on how our reputation has evolved in this respect?

0:51.7

Canada's had an interesting track record from the time it signed the OECD

0:56.6

convention in 1997. And by interesting, I mean, very boring for the first several years.

1:03.2

Canada has been, I think it's safe to say, especially compared to other countries such as the

1:07.7

U.S. most obviously. Canada has been very slow off the mark, slow to get going.

1:13.7

We've done for various presentations along the way, these various sort of time charts or

1:17.8

chronologies.

1:18.8

And you see for really between, well, 1999 was when Canada enacted the CFPOA.

1:24.5

And then really for approximately the next nine to 10 years, there was

1:29.8

almost nothing. There was a small $25,000 conviction of a company called Hydro Clean in 2005,

1:37.2

which ironically, I don't want to get too far off topic, but the backstory of that was the company

1:42.3

actually was charged with a criminal code offense

1:44.6

and the CFPOA offense and nobody had ever heard of the CFPOA at that time. So it was actually

1:49.0

a plea bargain to something they thought was less serious. In any event, really, for that first

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.