meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
We the People

Can the Equal Rights Amendment be Revived?

We the People

National Constitution Center

News, News Commentary, History

4.61.1K Ratings

🗓️ 7 February 2019

⏱️ 72 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) technically expired on June 30, 1982, the ratification deadline set by Congress, but a renewed push to resurrect and ratify this constitutional amendment gained momentum in 2017, with ratification by Illinois and Nevada. Now, ERA proponents are looking to secure ratification in a  38th state, which would round out the necessary three-fourths majority of the states required to pass an amendment. Two leading voices on either side of the debate over the ERA – Linda Coberly, chair of the national ERA Coalition Legal Task Force, and Inez Stepman, senior policy analyst at the Independent Women’s Forum – join host Jeffrey Rosen to detail the potential constitutional, legal, political, and cultural effects of adding the ERA as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution.  Questions or comments about the podcast? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

I'm Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center,

0:10.0

and welcome to We The People, a weekly show of constitutional debate.

0:14.0

The National Constitution Center is a nonpartisan, non-profit chartered by Congress to increase

0:19.5

awareness and understanding of the Constitution among the American people.

0:24.2

In this episode we explore the Equal Rights Amendment, a proposed amendment to the Constitution.

0:30.7

The ERA technically expired in 1982, which was the ratification deadline set by Congress,

0:36.0

but a renewed push to resurrect and ratify the amendment gained momentum in 2017, leaving

0:41.4

to ratification by Illinois and Nevada.

0:44.0

Now supporters of the amendment are looking to secure ratification in a 38th state

0:49.0

which would round out the necessary two-thirds majority of the states required to pass the amendment

0:53.7

raising fascinating and important constitutional questions about whether or not

0:56.9

related ratification would be valid and if valid what the effects of an ERA

1:01.6

would be. Joining us to discuss this crucially important

1:05.0

series of constitutional questions are two of America's

1:08.9

leading commentators in this important debate. Linda Comber is a managing partner in the Chicago Office of Winston and Strawn.

1:17.0

She is chair of the National ERA Coalition's Legal Task Force and has briefed and argued many appeals in the Supreme Court, Federal courts and

1:24.0

state appellate courts, she clerk for justice Stephen Breyer.

1:27.6

Linda, thank you so much for joining.

1:29.7

Nice to be with you.

1:31.0

And Anez-Stepman is senior policy analyst at the Independent Women's Forum and

1:34.6

senior contributor to the Federalist, which she writes about politics and women's issues, including

1:38.8

the ERA. She previously served as director of the Education and Workforce Development Task Force at the American Legislative Exchange Council,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from National Constitution Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of National Constitution Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.