Hello and I'm Gregor Robertson. We're here with you twice a week throughout the season for all the best

reaction and analysis from some of the best football writers in the business.

Joining us in the studio today it is James Restall from The Times.

Coming up we're going to look ahead to England's 1000th

international match at Wembley on Thursday,

but first let's head to Anfield.

Liverpool laid down a significant marker in their bid to win a first league title in 30 years by beating the champions

Manchester City 3-1 at Anfield. The roof was lifted off Anfield as early as the

sixth minutes when Fabino drilled the ball past Claudio Bravo from 30 yards, but the goal was shrouded in controversy

as Citley thought they should have had a penalty just 22 seconds earlier

when the ball struck Trent Alexander Arnold's arm in the penalty area.

The AR checked the incident, deemed their Trent Alexander Arnold's arm in the penalty area.

The AR checked the incident, deemed there was no penalty, so the goal stood to bring another

huge roar from the Liverpool faithful.

But let's ask both yourselves, Greg and James where do you stand on the Manchester

City penalty shout obviously Pep Guareala believes they should have got a penalty

do you think they should have? Yes I think so I think the issue is the is the

rules first and foremost I think you know the natural silhouette if anything was

unnatural and that's solet that was definitely trying Alexander's arm in that situation.

I think I can see that I feel that when the ball kind of ricocheted back off Bernaro silver, you know,

it slowed down, fractionally slowed down freeze frames.

It happened very, very quickly and I feel like Alexander Arnold was really searching for Aguero.

...