Can economic reform bring world peace? Why some say yes? The picture shows two businessmen

shaking hands in front of a world map with money floating around them. They believe that the more

countries trade with one another, the less likely they will be to fight. For example, as the member states of the European Union

integrated their economies, they became more dependent on one another. This was said to promote

peace and stability in a region with a history of conflict. African leaders have also connected

prosperity with peace, and they claim that they can achieve both goals.

We are establishing the foundation for a massive increase in trade and investment in infrastructure,

says South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. He states,

Economic prosperity is key to sustainable peace.

They believe that spending more on preventing conflict can pave the way to peace.

They reason that when businesses invest in countries where there is a high risk of conflict,

new jobs can be created and public services improved.

Such efforts can address issues that are considered causes of conflict, including poverty, inequality, and a lack of opportunities for young people.

They believe that business can support programs that help build peace. For example, it is thought

that mentoring young people by having them

participate in local community projects can steer them away from terrorism and extremism.

Meanwhile, the African Development Bank recommends that financial organizations work closely with

humanitarian and peace-building efforts.

To think about, the international community has invested billions into economic development in recent decades.

If that approach could lead to world peace, why are there still so many conflicts around the world?

Can economic reform truly address conflicts that are driven by nationalism, religious extremism, or political divisions? The picture collage shows

problems caused by mankind. A fish is trapped in plastic waste and debris. A young boy works in a

...