This is Hidden Killers with Tony Bruske.

The case against Koeberger, it's getting more interesting by the moment, really,

and we're going to talk about some of those new developments here in just a second.

The latest turn of events in the case, the defense is hammering away at crucial new

revelations, unidentified male DNA at the crime scene. Now, this isn't exactly super new. We did

hear about this a long time ago, but hey, let's point it out more and maybe there's something

to it. Well, prosecutors, rather, remain steadfast in their case against Koeberger.

His legal team is arguing that this unknown DNA could suggest alternative suspects

or, at the very least, cast reasonable doubt.

That's the goal.

But will this argument hold up in court?

Could this be a potential game changer?

Or is it just another classic defense tactic that ultimately won't sway a jury? To break it all down, the legal

significance of the evidence of defense's strategy and what we can expect moving forward,

joined by attorney and former prosecutor, Eric Fattis. Eric, when we are looking at this case and the

discovery of the identified male DNA, is it something that you think really could truly

shake up the prosecution's case? Or is it just another one of the, you know, Hail Mary's, it

seems to be being thrown by Ann Taylor as we continue on this journey? Yeah, Tony, you know, Hail Mary's, it seems to be being thrown by Ann Taylor as we

continue on this journey.

Yeah, Tony, you know, in first hearing about it, it kind of seems like a bomb show, right?

It seems like this huge deal that there's other potential male DNA at the scene.

But when you really dig into it and what the potential explanations are for that DNA there,

...