Can Biden also be removed under the 14th amendment?
The Dershow
Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media
4.4 • 1.9K Ratings
🗓️ 22 August 2023
⏱️ 30 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Alan Dershowitz's podcast. Dershow media
APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772
SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99
_________________________________________________________
FOLLOW ME:
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDersh
RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_says
LOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/
YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz
_________________________________________________________
SUPPORT MY WORK:
SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/
--
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Welcome back to the Dershow. Yesterday, I talked about what I consider one of the greatest |
| 0:07.2 | dangers currently facing, our constitutional rule of law, the attempt by some get Trump |
| 0:14.2 | lawyers, judges, law professors to try to invoke the 14th Amendment to prevent Trump from |
| 0:22.8 | running for president of the United States. It's a bizarre idea, plainly unconstitutional, |
| 0:30.7 | but when it comes to get Trump, nothing is sacred, not the Constitution, not the rule of law. |
| 0:39.5 | Recently, Professor Lawrence Tribe and Judge Aleutek, who was called by MSNBC, |
| 0:47.0 | a modern-day poll revere, I would change it a little, a modern-day Joe McCarthy, |
| 0:52.5 | would probably be a little clear. I've argued in front of Judge Aleutek, he was a result-oriented |
| 0:59.3 | judicial person who didn't really ever consider legal analysis more than the results. I was never a |
| 1:10.7 | fan, a lot of Republicans liked him now, a lot of Republicans are leading the get Trump charge. |
| 1:19.9 | 30 or so more of them, former Republican professors, judges, etc, wrote a brief |
| 1:26.6 | and amicus brief to the court in the District of Columbia urging them to rush to injustice by |
| 1:33.9 | putting Trump on trial in January 2nd, which would be so clearly unconstitutional, as I've said. |
| 1:39.2 | If I were one of the lawyers in that case, I would stand in front of the judge and say, |
| 1:42.1 | sorry, Your Honor, I'm not trying this case on January 2nd. You can't make me violate my oath |
| 1:49.6 | of office to provide a zealous defense. You would be inviting an ineffective assistance of counsel. |
| 1:56.2 | I am not an ineffective assistance of counsel. I am not trying this case in four months and three |
| 2:03.2 | weeks after the indictment. It's unheard of. I don't care what these law professors think. |
| 2:07.7 | I'm not doing it. I'm not doing it and I urge every other lawyer to refuse to step into court |
| 2:14.0 | and to defend anybody on this kind of a rush to injustice schedule. It violates the defendant's |
| 2:21.4 | rights to a fair trial. It confuses the government's obligation to provide a fair trial with some sort |
| 2:29.1 | of speedy trials. Speedy trial in the Constitution only applies to defendants, but these get Trump |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

