Welcome to the advisory opinions podcast. This is David French with Sarah Isker. And Sarah,

the Supreme Court kind of sort of let us down today.

They did. They really did. Kind of sort of. I mean, I was all geared up to have a podcast

about the Obamacare decision ready for it. I mean, woke up this morning thinking Obamacare

is Obamacare today, Obamacare day. But no, no, we'll fill you in on what happened at

the Supreme Court today. The answer is not much. But what we can do, we'll talk a little

bit of scot of stuff, including some bingo. We're going to talk about a new lawsuit out of

Texas that is quite interesting. And I believe got some merit to it. I'm going to talk about

a teacher lawsuit that's interesting. We're going to do a little AP history curriculum.

Don't change the dial because that's going to be fun. And then Sarah's experience camping

out. No, not in the Himalayas, not in the Andes, not in the Rockies in the middle of Washington,

DC. So we've got a lot to cover. But Sarah, let's start with a little bit of bingo and

get your thoughts on this because you are our foremost practitioner of Supreme Court bingo

in the advisory opinions podcast. So someone who also plays Supreme Court bingo in the

know on this has this assessment. And I want to get your reaction. So I got this email

over the weekend from somebody. You know who you are. Long time bingo player. And this

is his assessment. Supreme Court handed down a Monday, another decision in the November

sitting, which gives me more data on the bingo cards, supporting his tentative conclusion

that justice, Alito is writing the majority opinion in Fulton, V city, Affila, Delphia.

And that's the case. We've talked about a bunch, which is the was this involves Catholic

charities and same sex foster parenting slash adoption and religious liberty. So he's

of the conclusion, Alito is writing the majority opinion in Fulton, V city of Philadelphia.

...