Hey folks, we're watching Major Trials this week.

In Wisconsin, a jury acquitted Kyle Rittenhouse of charges for shooting and killing two men

and injuring a third man in 2020 during a night of protests following the police shooting

of Jacob Blake.

And in Georgia, the trial for the three men charged with killing them on Arbery, a 25-year-old

black man in 2020, is coming to a close.

Joyce Fantz and I discuss all of this and more on the Cafe Insider podcast.

Today, we're sharing a clip from the episode with listeners of Stay Tune.

To hear our full conversation and access all other Cafe Insider content, try the membership

free for two weeks.

You can do that at cafe.com slash insider.

That's cafe.com slash insider.

We look forward to having you as part of the insider community.

So let's talk about why he was acquitted.

Why it was not totally unreasonable for the jury to acquit, even though you at least thought

that given a particular instruction that they were given, there was a possibility of conviction.

And the main reason from a sort of 30,000-foot level is that what people don't always appreciate

is the law dictates certain things that are different from what Common Sense tells you.

So a lot of what this case came down to was a focused concentration on that narrow moment

with respect to his shooting three people.

And whether in that moment, notwithstanding, to some degree, notwithstanding, the decision

to come to another state, the decision to be carrying an AR-15, the decision to be in

...