Hey folks, Preet here.

Big Supreme Court news this week.

The justices unanimously ruled that states cannot disqualify former President Donald Trump from

the ballot for his role in the January 6th insurrection and seeking to

overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. But the justices were

divided on how far the decision should go. Meanwhile, the court granted review of Trump's immunity defense in the

election subversion criminal prosecution. Oral arguments are scheduled for

late April. Complicating Trump's trial calendar, as Judge Cannon and Florida also considers when to

schedule the Marlago documents trial. Joyce Vance and I discuss all that and

more on the Café Insider Podcast to hear our full conversation and access all other Cafe Insider content, try the membership

for just $1 for one month. You can do that at Cafe.com slash Insider.

That's Cafe.com slash insider. We look forward to having you as a part of the

insider community. So let's talk about the first item, which we've been talking about for some time, and it's a bit of a

controversial subject and people have different views about how it should have gone but the Supreme Court ruled in

fairly short order 9 to 0 on the question of whether or not Donald Trump by

operation of section 3 of the 14th Amendment could be removed from the

ballot based on the language of that section of the 14th Amendment that relates

to insurrection.

And I will say, I don't want to do any sort of I told you so's.

Of course when people preface a sentence with,

I don't want to do any I told you so.

What follows is often some kind of I told you so.

...