Hey folks, Preet here, another busy week of politically charged legal news making the headlines.

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling that could gut the Voting Rights Act,

holding that only the federal government, not private citizens, could challenge

voting practices that discriminate on the basis of race.

In other news, the judge overseeing Donald Trump's Georgia prosecution declined to send

one of Trump's co-defendants to

jail over recent social media posts targeting witnesses. Later this week

the judge will hold a hearing on Trump's motions to dismiss the charges.

Joyce Vance and I discuss all that and more on the

Cafe Insider Podcast. Today we're sharing an excerpt from the episode with

listeners of stay tuned. To hear our full conversation and access all other exclusive content, become a member of Cafe Insider.

Right now, through December 3rd, you can get 50% off the annual membership price for the first year.

Just head to Cafe.com slash informed.

That's cafe.com slash informed.

We look forward to having you as a part of the Insider Community. The big question is, the people must be asking, well, the Voting Rights Act,

Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act was passed six decades ago.

And you might be wondering, well, how many times has it been litigated by private litigants

who the Eighth Circuit now suddenly six decades later say there's no private right of action they don't have a right to

sue and the answer is choice hundreds of times and how can it be the case that

hundreds of time including in the Supreme Court of the United States it has been

been assumed, including in the Supreme Court of the United States, hundreds of times, it has been

assumed, even if not decided directly, so assumed that there is a private right of action that it has not resulted in the

...