meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

Buckle Up, John Roberts

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

Slate Audio

News Commentary,, Government, News

4.63.4K Ratings

🗓️ 4 January 2020

⏱️ 51 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Slate’s own Mark Joseph Stern to discuss Chief Justice John Roberts’ New Year’s resolutions on the judiciary, impeachment, and this Supreme Court term. Stern’s book American Justice 2019: The Roberts Court Arrives is out now. 


Podcast produced by Sara Burningham.

Stay in touch: amicus@slate.com

Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/amicuspodcast/

Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

If Roberts gets to uphold the rule of law and embarrass Trump a little bit in the process, that might just be a win-win for him.

0:16.8

Hi, and happy New Year, and welcome back to Amicus Slate's podcast about the law and the courts and the Supreme Court and the rule of law and, you know, justice and impeachment.

0:32.6

Or as I've come to think of all that stuff, Chief Justice John Roberts' toiletry kit.

0:39.3

I'm Dolly Lithwick. I Justice John Roberts' toiletry kit. I'm Dahlia Luthwick. I cover John Roberts' toiletry kit as my job for Slate, and I'm actually not exaggerating at all

0:45.3

when I tell you that nobody is as shocked as I that a graying attorney from Long Beach, Indiana,

0:51.6

is now somehow the most interesting and important constitutional

0:55.3

player in America. Check that. I think John Roberts is a little bit more surprised than I am

1:01.6

to learn that this is the case. So this week's show is going to focus on the Chief Justice

1:06.5

as we try to make sense of an impeachment chess game that's somehow about equal parts three-dimensional

1:13.1

chess, but also one part, hungry, hungry hippo. Before we get to institutional chess, hippos,

1:20.1

I want to thank those of you who wrote in following our last show when we spoke to a bunch of

1:25.4

lawyers who are volunteering their time and skills to support

1:28.3

people applying for asylum at the southern border. Liz in Seattle wrote in to let us know about

1:33.6

the organizations she's connected with to help put her attorney's license to use in service of

1:39.5

people who are facing the daunting task of navigating the current unforgiving system. So I wanted to share the name

1:45.6

of one of the organizations that she mentioned with you. That's kids in need of defense or kind,

1:51.1

support kind.org. And they put the training in support of pro bono attorneys at the very center

1:56.9

of their work. Douglas in Illinois wrote in to recommend immigrants rising. Douglas

2:02.5

writes, they have written a careful legal guide for educational institutions to provide financial

2:07.3

support for the many undocumented young people now in this country. In particular, they helped

2:13.6

us generate fellowships for three students involved in summer science, technology, engineering, math, and research program targeted at underrepresented high school students in our community in Champaign, Urbana.

2:24.9

Thank you to both Douglas and Liz for just reminding us that everyday people who listen to this show can do extraordinary work.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Audio, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Audio and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.