At the end of this busy week, capped off with today's Supreme Court decisions, let's turn now to the analysis of Brooks and K. Part. That is, New York Times columnist, David Brooks and Jonathan K. Part, associate editor for the Washington Post. And we should say that you are both joining us tonight from the Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado. Your beautiful backgrounds make me wish I was there with you guys. It's great to see you,

but let's jump right in to those Supreme Court decisions today. Big wins for the president,

one on allowing religious parents to opt their kids out of LGBTQ learning and storybooks in school.

The other severely limiting lower court's ability to issue nationwide injunctions. We heard President Trump

very happily thank the justices who ruled in his favor earlier today. Take a listen.

I want to thank Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion brilliantly as well as Chief Justice

Roberts, and justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas. Great people.

Jonathan kick us off here. What's your reaction to those rulings? What do you take away from that?

Well, on the injunction ruling, you know, I reached out to a former senior official in a Democratic

administration just to get their take on it. And the response back was mixed bag.

And it's mixed bag because on the one hand,

Democratic presidents and Republican presidents never liked it

when a lower court judge reached in and, you know,

stopped them from doing something with a nationwide injunction.

I'm thinking particularly of President Biden

and say student loan, student loan debt forgiveness.

But when it comes to what the court did

in terms of birthright citizenship,

the ruling has stayed,

the injunction is still in place for 30 days.

But after 30 days,

we're going to be in a situation where children born in the 28 states that weren't a party to this ruling could be born, not be citizens in those states.

...