Most of you know we made a change at quarterback and I understand all the speculation and everything that surrounds a move like that.

And I can tell you, look,

we're desperately trying to win and sure in our in our game today there are economics and all those other things but the number one

Push behind this and and it's a decision I'm making is to you know get a spark

offensively. Well that was the stunner yesterday from the Denver Broncos

announced earlier in the day confirmed by Sean Payton at his press conference

that's the final word from Russell Wilson last night God's got me looking forward to

what's next whoa which confirms it's over take away yeah it's over it's over take away. Yeah, it's over it's over and look when it initially came out yesterday

I think it was Ian Rappaport that said the Broncos are seriously considering benching Russell Wilson for the final two games.

The language is very soft, but still the takeaway was benching him for Jared Stidham and then Shefty follows that up with they're benching him for this effort to get a

spark in the offense and that's baloney I'm here to tell you the idea that they're doing this to get a spark in the offense is as

Chris as you would say bullshit that's not why they're doing it they're doing it

to get out of his contract and not get themselves in a predicament where they would owe him another 37 million dollars

fully guaranteed if he can't pass a physical by the fifth day of the league year that starts on March 13.

That's a given.

And for Sean Payton to say its performance related that

we're trying to get a spark that makes it even worse that's the ultimate vote

of no confidence in your franchise quarterback when has a franchise quarterback ever had the ball taken out of his hands

to give a spark to the offense?

Unless you're done with him.

You don't think he's a franchise quarterback anymore. You're

taking the ball out of his hands, he's not a franchise quarterback, therefore hit

...