meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Bill Whittle Network

Broke It. Didn’t Buy It.

Bill Whittle Network

Bill Whittle Network

News

4.9720 Ratings

🗓️ 8 July 2025

⏱️ 15 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Prior to the Invasion of Iraq in 2003, Colin Powell famously advised, “if you break it, you buy it,” meaning that nation-building inevitably had to follow any large-scale military action against a hostile routine. Did the magnificently-orchestrated Operation Midnight Hammer finally put an end to this pernicious policy?

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Did Donald Trump make the pottery barn rule obsolete?

0:04.0

I'm Scott Ott with Bill Whittle and Stephen Green.

0:06.0

This episode of Right Angle is brought to you by the members at Bill Whittle.com.

0:10.0

A gentleman, there was an op-ed piece under the headline that Trump has buried the

0:16.0

You Break It, You Own It, a rule in the rubble of fordo in Iran after the bombing of the nuclear facilities there.

0:24.6

And this, in the course of the story, you find out Stephen Green, that this is attributed to General Colin Powell,

0:30.9

former General Colin Powell, I guess you always get to be a general, who apparently counseled President Bush that if he were to execute a decapitation strike on Iraq,

0:44.1

he said, Powell told Bush allegedly, if you take out a government, you take out a regime.

0:49.0

Guess who becomes the government and the regime and is responsible for the country, you are.

0:56.5

And Mark Thiesin, who wrote this piece in the, I believe it's the Washington Post, yes it is, that the pottery barn, you break it,

1:03.4

you bought it basically, said he's glad to see this rule die because President Trump apparently

1:10.2

doesn't believe in that at all.

1:11.8

He's, you break it. It's their problem. Now, Steve, part of me resonated with this. And I said,

1:18.6

oh, well, that's, that is refreshing to kind of, we don't, we don't evaluate military objectives

1:23.5

anymore in terms of the cleanup that we're going to have to do afterward. But I'm wondering if the

1:30.5

author of this piece is really making an apples and oranges comparison, so to speak.

1:37.0

The striking of the nuclear power plants was not a decapitation strike. It was not designed to

1:42.1

take down the regime, although that could be a long-term

1:45.2

issue. Yeah, that was the first thing that struck me. Yeah. So, I mean, I guess two questions.

1:52.2

One, do you think, do you agree with me that this is really not a good comparison? But two,

1:57.9

is on the terms of the doctrine so-called itself, is it a good idea for the United States

2:04.2

to have that view that if we do take out a regime, it's our responsibility to give a hand

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Bill Whittle Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Bill Whittle Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.