meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Nature Podcast

Briefing Chat: Can NASA return rocks from Mars? And why dogs have long ears

Nature Podcast

podcast@nature.com

News, Science, Technology

4.5893 Ratings

🗓️ 16 January 2026

⏱️ 10 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hi listeners, Benjamin here. Welcome to the first episode of the Nature Briefing podcast. Now, if you heard the main Nature podcast on Wednesday, you'll know we're spinning the briefing chat section out into its own show, which will go live on a Friday. And we'll talk about a couple of stories that we've read in the Nature briefing, which is nature's daily roundup of the latest science stories. And talking with me today is Nick Petrich Howe. Nick, how you doing? I'm doing well, Ben. Thank you for having me on our first one of these briefing chat shows. I'm excited to get into it. Well, I'm excited too,

0:38.6

and we've got a couple of really great stories. First up, we've got a story, well, perhaps it's the

0:44.2

conclusion of a story, and it's about getting samples back from the surface of Mars to Earth. And this is a

0:51.5

story I read about in nature. So yeah, this is something we've been

0:54.6

talking about for a while in the podcast. Obviously, many scientists keen to get their hands on

0:59.5

this. How is it all going? Well, this is one of those stories that I think is perhaps not entirely

1:03.7

unexpected. It has to be said. But how it's gone over the last few years is, of course,

1:07.7

the Perseverance Rover has been rolling around the surface of Mars,

1:11.8

collecting rock samples since 2021. And as we covered on the show, I mean, it stored many of these

1:18.3

in its belly and also deposited some on the surface. And there are 40-something sample tubes,

1:24.2

Nick, most of which are filled with different types of rock. But the problem has always been...

1:29.4

How do we get them back? Yeah, they're a long, long way away, and how we get them back to Earth. A massively

1:34.4

ambitious project, and one that would be massively expensive. In 2023, we ran a story in nature

1:40.4

suggesting that it could cost $11 billion, which would be similar to the cost of

1:45.4

building the James Webb Space Telescope, the J-W-S-T. And about a year ago, NASA said, well,

1:52.6

we've got a couple of plans. We're investigating some paths to go down, way to save some money,

1:57.5

sort of kicking the can down the road. And that brings us to something that happened

2:02.4

last week. Okay. So what happened last week? Is the can finally hit the end of the road?

2:07.9

I think the can has struck the end of the road. So last week, a bipartisan group of U.S.

2:13.1

lawmakers passed a spending bill which axes the return program. And a lot of scientists, I think,

2:20.8

were obviously disappointed because there are, of course, a lot of questions that won't be

2:25.7

answered as a result of not having these rocks. Yeah, right. I can imagine that they're disappointed.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from podcast@nature.com, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of podcast@nature.com and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.