Phil, you know, you're 100% correct. I think that most prosecutors, of course, would love to have the body,

and they would look at themselves and go, how am I going to get a conviction without a body?

And here's the answer. It's called circumstantial evidence, from which inferences are drawn.

So if you come up with, you know, if I was the prosecutor,

I'd write every inconsistency down that Brian Hooker either physically did

or spoke about or talked about or alleged.

And I would write them all down. that is your case then of course you

have evidence if we can have digital evidence that shows what he said in the three days of

interviews with the Bahamian police is absolute lies it's just like getting them getting smacked right

across the face with your own lies.

Professor Mike.

Yeah, because he can't back away from those statements anymore because they were made to

TV cameras.

And so it's it's not like you've got like an elderly witness who said, yeah, he said this

to me.

I think about, you think about 18 months ago.

I can't remember exactly the context,

but I think that's what he said.

No, this is all videotaped.

They got it.

He said it publicly.

He knew he was saying it publicly.

...