meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Breyer Versus Second Amendment

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Cato, Peace, Policy, Politics, Markets, Defense, Government, News, News Commentary, 424708, Immigration, Libertarian

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 1 July 2010

⏱️ 8 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Thursday, July 1st, 2010.

0:07.0

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:08.0

When Stephen Breyer issued his dissent in the McDonald gun case that applied the Second Amendment of states and localities, he wasn't

0:15.2

so much arguing against incorporation as he was re-arguing the Heller case and arguing against

0:21.4

the Second Amendment itself.

0:23.0

So says Cato Institute legal policy analyst David Ritgers.

0:27.0

Briar embraced the idea that the role of courts, particularly under due process in corporation, is to decide what rights are fundamental, what rights are non-fundamental and with this license to write out of the

0:48.5

Constitution of the Bill of Rights those non-fundamental rights.

0:53.0

He would put the Second Amendment in that category.

0:56.1

Write them out of the Constitution?

0:58.2

Make them a dead letter in terms of enforcement.

1:00.4

I think that qualifies as writing them out. Specifically on the Second Amendment, what does he say about that enumerated right in the Bill of Rights?

1:10.0

He points to social science that he says makes the changed circumstances sense the founding

1:18.0

mean that we have to consider this right in a different light than the plain text and the history of not just the Second Amendment,

1:26.6

which was the issue in Heller, but with McDonald, the history of the drafting of the 14th Amendment and the deprivations of the

1:37.1

K K K K and the state governments that freedmen in the South suffered immediately

1:42.4

following the Civil War, but in his view, what he considers

1:48.0

to be persuasive social science on the dangers of firearms being available to the people that that outweighs the plain text,

2:00.8

the history, the intent, all of the things that courts may look at.

2:06.6

We should note that there is plenty of social science on the other side of the issue where having more guns does not make for necessarily a more dangerous society and more crime.

2:21.0

And in fact, John Lott has produced a book, more guns, less crime, now in its third edition,

2:28.1

and it's been 10 years since the last edition where there's 10 more years of data in support of his thesis that more guns can equal less crime.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.