Breaking: Trump Flees as Supreme Court Poised to Rule Against Him in Birthright Citizenship Case
The Parnas Perspective
MeidasTouch Network
5.0 • 21.5K Ratings
🗓️ 1 April 2026
⏱️ 9 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | We have some big news this afternoon. The Supreme Court just finished hearing oral arguments in a case that could decide whether or not Donald Trump will be able to change the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution to make birthright citizenship obsolete for those who have parents who are undocumented. |
| 0:18.1 | And while after hearing over two hours of oral argument, I can confidently say both as a journalist |
| 0:23.6 | and as a lawyer who has studied constitutional law in the past, that this Supreme Court is poised |
| 0:30.6 | to rule against the President of the United States. |
| 0:33.6 | And it's maybe why he left in the middle of oral argument after his solicitor general was peppered with questions from the conservatives and the liberals on the court. |
| 0:44.3 | I watched the entire oral argument so that you didn't have to, and I'm going to break down some of the key moments for you in this video. |
| 0:51.3 | Before I do, make sure to like, comment, share, and subscribe. Subscribe to my substack. Click the link below to support my work as I get you this in real time throughout the day, throughout the week. We're fighting to build something independent, and I'm bringing it to you not just from a journalistic perspective, but also from a legal one. So please subscribe if you can. I rely on you, so let's break it down. |
| 1:11.7 | Today's Supreme Court arguments turned on a simple question, |
| 1:15.1 | whether an individual born to two undocumented parents in the United States of America |
| 1:20.2 | is automatically entitled to birthright citizenship under the United States Constitution. |
| 1:25.4 | The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution is clear in what it says regarding birthright citizenship. |
| 1:32.3 | It says that all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof |
| 1:38.1 | are citizens of the United States of America and of the state wherein they reside. |
| 1:43.9 | No state shall make or enforce any law, |
| 1:46.3 | which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens in the United States, |
| 1:50.0 | nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. |
| 1:55.9 | That's the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. And while Trump is arguing that those born to two undocumented |
| 2:02.3 | parents are not subject to the jurisdiction thereof of the United States, but the first clause |
| 2:08.3 | born or naturalized in the United States, well, that is what this question turns on. If you are |
| 2:13.9 | born, are you a citizen? And this answer to that is seemingly yes, and it looks as though |
| 2:18.5 | the justices will agree. I want to begin by showing you a moment from Chief Justice John Roberts, |
| 2:24.5 | a conservative on the bench, who contradicted what Trump's attorneys were trying to argue. Take a listen. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from MeidasTouch Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of MeidasTouch Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

