BREAKING: MAJOR TRUMP WIN At Supreme Court Following Debate
Sekulow
Jay Sekulow
4.5 • 1.4K Ratings
🗓️ 28 June 2024
⏱️ 50 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
President Donald Trump just got a massive U.S. Supreme Court victory following the CNN presidential debate (hosted by Jake Tapper and Dana Bash). On the other hand, the Democrat Party is in full-panic mode after President Joe Biden's disastrous performance. Will Biden remain the 2024 Democrat presidential nominee going forward? The Sekulow team discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the Fischer/J6 case, the debate highlights, the election polls, possible candidates to replace Biden (Vice President Kamala Harris, former presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, California Governor Gavin Newsom, and former First Lady Michelle Obama), the SCOTUS decision overturning the Chevron case, which is a big blow to the Deep State, other ACLJ news – and much more.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Breaking news today on Secular, is there's a major Trump win at the Supreme Court. |
| 0:07.0 | Keeping you informed and engaged. |
| 0:08.9 | Now more than ever, this is Secular. We want to hear from you. |
| 0:15.0 | Share and post your comments for call 1-800, 684, 3-110. |
| 0:22.0 | And now your host, Jordan Seculo. |
| 0:25.0 | All right, welcome back to Seculo, folks. |
| 0:28.0 | We can now cover the debate. |
| 0:30.0 | But there is a major decision out of the Supreme Court this morning that affects one of the debaters last night, President Trump and Jack Smith, especially when it relates to the charges that were brought in Washington DC the criminal charges against |
| 0:44.1 | President Trump in Washington DC. Now President Trump was not the one who brought |
| 0:48.3 | this case another January 6th defendant did but it directly impacts two of the four charges that Jack Smith brought |
| 0:55.9 | against President Trump related to January 6. So what did the Supreme Court say? |
| 1:01.0 | The Supreme Court said that if you're going to charge someone like |
| 1:04.8 | President Trump with a conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding or the |
| 1:11.8 | obstruction of an attempt to obstruct an official proceeding. |
| 1:16.0 | It has to be like documents. |
| 1:17.7 | It has to be something really related to the proceeding itself. |
| 1:21.4 | It's not speech. This is a win for the freedom of speech and |
| 1:25.1 | liberty. We filed in this case because we thought this would be devastating to |
| 1:29.6 | again those who were the right to protest that isn't justifying what happened on January 6th |
| 1:36.3 | that isn't saying you can go in and trespass of course those other charges against |
| 1:40.6 | other defendants are different. |
| 1:42.8 | They don't throw out all those charges. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jay Sekulow, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Jay Sekulow and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.