They've been negotiating really well with Western made weapons, 7-6-2 and putting bullets in Russians.

That's a pretty dang solid negotiation tactic, I think.

So I just want to go back.

I just say, wait a minute, Mario.

You can play the macho game all you want, all right?

It's not a macho game.

I'm just asking you for your stance because earlier you stated that.

So is your stance that the you said it that is an independent

So is your stance that the Russians withdrew purposely that Russia has your stance is your stance

I'm trying to make it clear because you stated earlier is your stance that the reason Russia lost

all that terrain east of the Denebro because of negotiations that didn't go through

and that they out of their goodwill decided to go back to that zero line?

The reason why Russia initiated its withdrawal from around Kiev is because of that agreement.

You know that and I know that historians know that.

We also know that the United States injected $48 billion worth of military assistance into a depleted Ukrainian military, retrained forces,

re-equipped, brought in foreign advisors, and they carried out a surprise attack, an attack

that exploited the fact that Russia and the cartical of error are withdrawn more than 50% of their

forces. We know that to the case. Did you shoot Russians in the back? You being, I guess not you

personally,

but the Ukraine? Sure. They achieved a military victory. They would, they, they caused the Russians to

withdraw from from, from, anyways, in accordance with this agreement. Okay, so thank you. So,

they caused them, so they caused them to withdraw from territories that they were going to withdraw from,

...