I think the bigger issue was we already had military access to Greenland.

We already had cooperation from NATO.

We already had access to the Arctic.

So Trump can spin this into a whim and win and maybe he'll get some gains out of it, but at what cost? Hey guys. Here is some bonus content for all of our independent Americans, all of our

vigilant, very vigilant and most vigilant. This is a TV interview that I recently did that I hope continues to expand all the conversations

we're having on this show.

Be sure to subscribe on Apple Podcast

and follow us on YouTube

where you can find this conversation

in every regular TV and media interview I do.

It's another way I hope I can help you.

Stay vigilant.

Thank you. Stay vigilant. Ivan Davos, Switzerland. Paul Rykoff is here with me in New York. He's the host of the

Independent Americans podcast, joins us every week. And you agree this has been kind of a distraction,

maybe with now military action off the table and the speech,

tariffs as of this afternoon off the table, we move on and figure something out. I wonder

what this agreement the president is alluding to with Greenland really is about. I think it's

even worse than a distraction. I think this has been deeply damaging to the world's trust in

America. I mean, NATO is considering invoking Article 5 against the United States if we attack Greenland,

if we attack Denmark.

There are Danish combat troops in Greenland.

The entire continent of Europe was preparing for a military incursion by the Americans.

...