This is not only Catholic news, it's secular news.

I am going to be reading from a New York Times piece today with the following title,

that the Pope says a strong U.S. faction offers a backward, narrow view of the church.

In unusually sharp remarks published this week, Pope Francis said some conservative American Catholics.

Wrongly ignore much of the church's mission and reject the possibility of change.

Now, Paris Rovers of Retrogrades, I'm not a journalist, but what's posed by this headline and subscript is an interesting dilemma because in this article,

Pope Francis is essentially paraphrased here, titularly, with the title.

He does not ever explicitly say that you're bad if you reject the possibility of doctrinal

change.

But he's paraphrased to saying that.

And it seems like to the extent that Francis plays on weaponized ambiguity, his cohorts at the New York Times are in on the act.

That's the best I can do. I'm going to read part of this article to you today.

What you need to know, for starters, is that this is a prelude to the October Senate, the upcoming

October Synodonon Synodality. I've been warning you about it for

a year and a half, really almost two years. And we're almost at go time. Tomorrow is September the

first. Tomorrow we can say next month, such and thus catastrophe is going to take place at the synod.

Tomorrow we're one month away.

So the New York Times and the fellow travelers around the globe of the lead man of the left,

Pope Francis, are prepping you by saying that only the bad guys,

backward people, reject the possibility of change. Though, this is New York Times saying

Pope Francis says thus and such. Interesting, interesting approach. Before we get started on that, I want to

tell everybody to go to realestateforlife.org, realestateforlife.org, get out of your blue state,

...