We have major developments this afternoon. The White House has an Epstein problem that does not seem to be going away, no matter how much the president and those around him wanted to.

This afternoon, we're learning confirmation that the White House and the Department of Justice have actively concealed several Epstein-related files that show witness accusations against the president of the United States for

child sex abuse. At the same time, the Epstein files fallout continues to grow fast with

multiple wealthy, powerful people resigning from key positions as a result of their close

relationship to Jeffrey Epstein. A major development right now, make sure to like, comment, share, and subscribe.

The more you like, the more people see, and we need to keep the pressure on.

Subscribe to my sub-stack, click the link below to support my work or send a Venmo to Aaron-Parnas to keep me caffeinated.

Let's jump right into it.

This afternoon, we're learning that the following documents have yet to be released by the Justice Department.

These documents contain witness interviews of a woman, a now woman, who at the time in the 1980s was somewhere between 13 to 15 years old.

She was a child. The highlighted documents are documents that the Department of Justice has never released.

As you can see, their interview notes, an interview 302s, license records, and a law enforcement report.

Now, why are these documents important? Well, these documents are important, because in these FBI 302s,

in these interview notes, that woman accuses the president of the United States of abusing her as a child back in the 1980s.

This Department of Justice has actively withheld and concealed documents that may prove, or at least show,

that the President of the United States is not as exonerated as he claims to be.

And we may now know why. Because according to a January 4th, 2026 memo released by the Justice Department, attorneys in the DOJ will require to

apply specific tags to FBI 302s. 302s are interview notes, essentially memorialized from an interview

with an FBI agent.

As you can see at the bottom, it says if a document is tagged responsive, please proceed to

evaluating whether it needs a content tag listed below. The ones that they have include deals,

charging, destruction, flight logs, and 302s. So they specifically tagged FBI 302s like those mentioning serious, not horrific,

...