Welcome to the Sunday edition of the Bust Open podcast, along with Justin Labar. I'm Jonathan Hood.

And on today's show, we discuss the booking philosophies of WW's Triple H and A.A.W's Tony Kahn.

This is the busted open podcast. When it comes to the battle of WW and AEW, I know that there's a difference in booking philosophies.

I think that's pretty clear.

When it comes to WWE under Triple H,

because this is where we are right now,

we've talked so often about the slow burn booking

and storytelling of Triple H

when it comes to the bloodline, the common sense type of booking,

because we can compare that to Vince McMahon toward the end of his tenure and his run,

where everything was scattershot, and it was kind of like these two or three week builds,

or you have the same match eight or nine weeks in a row on raw or

smackdown it's kind of like where are you going with this the whole regime for events over

the last couple of years was where are you going with this and why are you doing this here with

triple h it's more to me more wrestling less fluff give me more that works versus those that don't,

give me what matters and cut the fluff out of the wrestling.

I think that's the difference between Vince and Triple H. Is that fair?

Absolutely. I think, and just to kind of add on to that, it's the,

under the Triple H era, it is to make a point and not, we're not going to give you the same thing twice unless it is obviously intentional. Why?

Oh, there's an obvious rematch.

Like, to your point, I mean, Vint, like, to any young listeners or viewers who maybe didn't watch

closely, didn't watch at all prior to Vince's exit, I mean, I'm not exaggerating. He would give

...