Welcome to the rush hour, your daily dose of pop culture for your rush hour ride.

Buckle up and enjoy the drive with your host, stand-up comedian Dave Neal.

Hey folks, it's Dave Neal here with a bonus episode of the Rush Hour podcast.

Coming to you from my mobile studio setup.

Not a bad gig over here, right? I've got all the

updates on the Justin Baldoni versus Blake Lively Universe. A new hit piece came out from the New York

Times. Now on its surface, it looks credible, but of course we know the New York Times was the

magazine, the newspaper that broke the whole initial story where Blake was the damsel in distress.

What came out afterwards was Baldoni sharing his side of the story.

Rather than provide more nuance, they double down.

And I'm going to share really great work by the internet.

I mean, the internet just doesn't get it wrong, right?

I mean, sometimes they do. But we've got great work and what they've had to say about this hit piece. I'm going to read it

for you and share some of those notes put online. Here's a great comment that's going to sum up

what we have coming up. The New York Times failed to address the many SH incidents. They

published that have now disappeared. They failed to acknowledge

that many of Blake's allegations have disappeared and or have changed. The central dance video

allegations have now changed after Blake found out there was indeed audio. New York Times also failed

to mention many of Justin's arguments, including Blake lively improvising, kissing him on the

lips unscripted before the dance scene was ever filmed. Megan Toohey said she reviewed thousands of

pages of evidence, including Justin repeatedly barging into Blake's dressing room while she was

undressed in breastfeeding. Well, where is the evidence you've reviewed New York Times?

...