Now I mean it's weird because when I think about intersectionality in the good way I mean maybe

it's totally ruined and I should just use some other word that doesn't have all these horrible

like neoliberal academy woke connotations I think specifically like oh yeah you

need a plan to address things that affect specific groups of people in

specific ways like immigrants and that seems like what he's doing there but apparently not.

So we continue.

Intersectionality also can and should have a tone, an effect.

When Sanders supporters claim...

We need a police but for tone.

When Sanders supporters claim as Nancy Fraser and Liza Featherstone doing Jackabin,

Friends of the Show, tread carefully.

That he is, quote, the only candidate in the race who is advancing a politics that will actually improve the lives of all those women

and dismiss any supporters of other candidates as dupes quote suckered by cynical

invocations of feminism feminism. Feminism has never been invoked cynically before.

Who, quote, seek to undermine a progressive mass movement.

They display a hubris that is at odds with both the facts and the passionate

commitments to broad-based social justice of Warren and her supporters.

So right there, people.

Right there, you see, you do not have any fucking right to say this.

When your candidate wants to means test her child care program and

Bernie fucking does it. Also how is it at odds with the facts? How is it at like you're

saying that it's disrespectful towards Warren and her supporters

...