What if you used the shuttle to steal a military camera satellite and use that for your own?

That you can't, okay, so-

Haven't you just given us the plot of Moonraker?

It's the part of Moonraker.

It's also a real thing, like, um, I venture to suggest this is an area that, like, is not widely spoken about, for good reason, but like I would be amazed if no one had come up with the idea of like kidnapping a satellite or indeed if it hadn't been done.

That was part of the mission perimeter for the design of the

space shuttle was that it had to be able to rendezvous with a satellite in an

orbit that could only have launched from the cosmodrome and return to the US.

Like that was that was literally one of the missions it was designed to do was to capture a Soviet satellite.

Yeah, I'm just adding the extra things I didn't even use the satellite for like street photography.

Yeah.

I hate to burst your bubble, but like under 1G of gravity because satellites are built to be as lightweight as possible

because lifting a launch pass is expensive.

The structural stability of the camera will be so compromised that you wouldn't have optical alignment under 1G of course.

Sorry.

Oh, God damn much.

Just me being like, nah, that's fine, I don't need a tripod.

Incidentally, I went on a really good podcast called Failure to Launch about the time that the CIA kidnapped a satellite that hadn't even left Earth yet.

Right, actually it had left Earth that had come back to Earth and the Soviets just like put it on on like display and the CIA kind of kidnapped it was a interesting story to my knowledge is still in that like rotting away in a in a hangar we could you know

yeah I thought they just moved I'm pretty sure it's going to a museum. I'm not sure. Well museum is actually easier to get to rather than a locked hangar.

Honestly, it's on display you can just walk up and scope the place easily. We'll wrap, we use Mia for local intelligence. We use Victoria for a getaway driver.

I mean, yeah, no, perfect.

...