Blood Libel at MIT

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch

News, Government, Politics

4.7 • 4K Ratings

🗓️ 14 March 2024

⏱️ 68 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Sarah and David react to the Robert Hur’s congressional testimony, but first Sarah responds to a recent article that claimed she was assisting Hur in his testimony (and thanks the loyal listeners who came to her defense). The Agenda: —David’s thoughts on the Hur hearings —Lessons in media training —Differences between the Trump and Biden documents cases —Partisanship making people awful —Complaint by Jewish students at MIT —Blood libel at MIT —Free speech or no speech on campus? —Positive racial discrimination? —The end of judge shopping Show Notes: —President Reagan, Mastermind - SNL —UC Berkeley Jewish students successfully march without confrontation Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	This episode is brought to you by
0:02.0	by Lanova Yoga. Inspiration is all around us,
0:06.0	and with the Lanova Yoga laptop, you'll be ready when it strikes.
0:10.0	The Lanova Yoga series is designed to create, edit, draw, render and more.
0:15.3	Powering your passion and supercharging your creativity.
0:18.7	Discover more at Curries or see Lanova.. Lanova. Yoga.
0:23.0	Engineer to do it all.
0:24.0	That's a laptop evolved with Intel Evo Platform.
0:27.0	Ready.
0:31.0	I was born ready. Welcome to Advisory opinions. I'm Sarah Isger. That's David French and yes, we're going to get to the testimony of Robert Her. We're also going to walk through several of the complaints coming in hot and fast to college campuses around the country and a little bit of a
1:04.5	diversity lawsuit heading toward the government an update perhaps to the
1:09.9	affirmative action decision from the Supreme Court last year,
1:12.9	moving up the chain.
1:14.1	But first, David, some breaking news of a sort.
1:18.8	There was a headline from the New York Times.
1:21.6	New Federal Judiciary rule will limit forum shopping by plaintiffs.
1:27.4	This sounds pretty awesome because right now if you file a case, let's say in the Northern District of Texas, it doesn't go to just
1:37.6	anyone in the Northern District of Texas, it matters what division you file it in.
1:41.2	So if you file it in the Amarillo division, there's only
1:44.1	one judge in the Amarillo division, and that's the judge who's become famous for forum
1:49.7	shopping, Judge Kasmaric. A lot of people have noted the problem with nationwide
1:55.6	injunctions. I mean, I think the biggest problem is that 400 judges can say no and
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.