I want to talk to you about virtue signaling.

This is a very interesting concept, relatively new to politics, maybe the last decade, 10 years.

So the liberal movement in the United States has always going all the way back to Teddy Roosevelt,

the turn of the 20th century, has always positioned itself

as the people who care about other people.

I kind of Barbara Streisand, you know, people who love people, are the luckiest people

in the world, whatever.

She was singing, and she's a big lefty.

So the liberal movement, they have based their point of view of life on helping the

downtrodden, all right, and being kind and compassionate and merciful and all of that.

And that's good.

That's good, okay?

Because if you're a Christian or many other religions, you're compelled to help other people,

to treat them as you want to be treated, to be kind to the poor, and all of that.

However, you can use your mercy as a weapon, and you can hurt people in the process of being sensitive and being virtuous.

Now that's what I'm going to explain. Supreme Court ruled that you cannot, all right, hire

or accept people into colleges based on skin color.

Affirmative action.

Can't.

You can't say we're going to take this percentage of this, this percentage of that.

Supreme Court said it violates the Constitution.

So the liberal movement outraged by that decision said, okay, we're going to disguise it.

...