meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

Biden's Border Reprieve From the Supreme Court

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

The Wall Street Journal

News, Society & Culture

4.22.8K Ratings

🗓️ 28 December 2022

⏱️ 23 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Expulsions at the U.S.-Mexico border under Title 42 will continue, as the Supreme Court agrees to hear a related case in February. Does this delay give Joe Biden a chance to put in place a plan for stopping illegal immigrants? Plus, the Census Bureau releases data showing that blue states like California are losing population, while red states like Florida are growing, and it isn't merely because of the weather. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Business, finance, politics.

0:03.3

There's a lot going on out there, and the Wall Street Journal's What's News podcast

0:06.7

covers it all, twice a day in less than 15 minutes.

0:10.1

Navigate your world with What's News, wherever you get your podcasts.

0:19.2

From the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal, this is Potomac Watch.

0:25.9

The Supreme Court keeps the Title 42 Border Expulsion Policy in place for now, as new census

0:31.7

data shows which states Americans are fleeing and where they're moving instead.

0:35.8

Welcome, I'm Kyle Peterson with The Wall Street Journal.

0:38.6

We are joined today by my colleagues, editorial board member, Maneu Uquay-Berua, and columnist

0:43.9

Kim Strassel.

0:44.9

The case is Arizona v. Mayorkas, Alejandro Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and

0:51.0

the Order for the Supreme Court is a stay that it says precludes giving effect to the District

0:56.2

Court Order setting aside and vacating the Title 42 policy, and the Supreme Court is then

1:01.8

directing the clerk to establish a briefing schedule to put this case on the February

1:07.2

2023 argument calendar.

1:09.8

That probably means that we will get a decision in maybe June the end of the Supreme Court's

1:14.9

term.

1:15.9

But on a pretty narrow question, here it is.

1:17.9

The parties are directed to brief and argue the following question whether the state

1:21.4

applicants may intervene to challenge the District Court's summary judgment order.

1:26.5

And so, Maneu, I'm getting a little tangled here on all of the procedural complexities

1:30.8

of this litigation around Title 42, and I'm hoping you can clarify that.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Wall Street Journal, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Wall Street Journal and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.