Welcome to the intersection of faith in the culture. Thanks for joining us today on wall billers. We're taking on the hot topics of the day from a biblical historical and constitutional perspective. We appreciate you being a part of the program today by listening, but we also want you to take action, which means when this program's over share it with your friends and family. Take the program and share it out there on social media on

email. However, you can get it in the hands of as many people as possible, especially today. I mean, we say that almost every day, right? But today, this program, I'm telling you, this is a big, big deal. It's going to have a huge impact on your life, on my life, on our children, our grandchildren. So we need to do everything we can to be a voice of reason and get some, some of this information in the hands of the people that aren't here at it anywhere else. I'm telling you, that's so hard to find truth these days. By the way, I'm Rick Green America's Constitution coach and a former Texas legislator. I'm here with David Barton and Tim Barton. David's

of course America's premier historian. He's our founder here at Wal-Bolters, Tim Barton, National Speaker and Pastor and President of Wal-Bolters. And we are thankful for you joining us. Check us out at our website wallbuilders.com and make that one time our monthly contribution there. Come alongside us. Help us reach as many people as possible with truth.

All right, David and Tim, we got to Michelle Bachman, former Congresswoman from Minnesota, going to be with us here in a little while. She's over at Regent University now, but she's been at the World Health Organization or Summit that they've been doing, trying to basically take over healthcare and pandemic control for the whole world. And so we'll get a report from her on that.

Is it surprising to you guys that American leaders would not want to have control like where does self interest part go, where everybody wants to have the power themselves. Why are they so willing to give this up to a

international organization?

Well, I don't think any conservatives and Republicans are promoting this. I say that. Maybe there's a couple that would be supportive of this, but they're definitely not conservative them. I'm a Republican. They're not conservative.

Certainly this is a position when you look at Democrats that have been promoting the growth of government. And especially when you look back to President Obama, when his notion, when he went on the apology to her for America and is kind of anti-American

exceptionalism talk when he said America's no more special than the other nation. We're all special in our own special ways. And there's been a move by progressive Democrat leftists to do make making a tip to dethrone America in Americans eyes, but also in the world stage saying America shouldn't be a world leader. And we should all just be this together. And we're one big team. And we're going to do things together.

So it's not surprising to me to see the Biden administration follow suit with what I think the Obama administration was promoting many years ago. So it's not a surprise to me. Again, there's probably a few Republicans that I could see getting behind this on some level, but this is definitely not a conservative position. And it's not a traditional American independent position by any regards.

And also notice that this is just about health care. We're just seeding control of health care to the World Health Organization. Recall COVID two and a half, three years ago, every single aspect of our life is controlled by health care. What we could do with worship, what we could do with speech, what we could do with education, what we could do with movement around the country, what we could do with our own jobs. We lost all of that under the guise of doing health care. So this is not a small step they're talking about. This is this is one of the steps toward complete control.

And I think one of the things to worth pointing out is when, when people look at this, maybe some of the advocates that are saying, hey, it's not that bad. And I don't think probably most of us people are listening to our show because probably they recognize this is a really, really bad thing. But there will be some people out there saying, guys, it's not that big a deal. It's, it's only in times of crisis. It's only in a health emergency. This is where it's also important to point out that there is vagueness. There is a level of subjectivity to how do we define a health emergency because COVID was a health emergency until we realized what COVID was until we

realized how COVID is certainly dangerous, but it's dangerous to, it's a people of a certain age demographic with certain comorbidities and certain health conditions. It's not, it's not actually dangerous for the average American that is young and that is healthy and that is active. And how do we define who determines what a health emergency is. And this is where it should be increasingly concerning when we're in a world in an era where you have this notion of

just follow the science, but really what we mean is follow the scientist. And when you have scientists that are literally on the payroll from Pfizer, right? When, when we know that Dr. Fauci is actually getting a, a, a payback from Pfizer for some of what they are doing, the money they're making, he's getting a kickback from them. When you have scientists that are leading the movement that are making money from big pharma and from these vaccine producers. And they're the ones that get to determine what a crisis is. There's a lot of reason we should be concerned.

Because even though we, we, we would not have previously thought that saying a health emergency was a subjective term. We are now in an era where I am certainly nervous of the level of subjectivity there is when a scientist can come in and say, oh, guys, health scare flu season coming up. We need to lock things down for flu season. Who determines what a crisis an emergency is in these scenarios? And the other thing that goes with that is even Zuckerberg is admitting now that on Facebook, they shut down a lot of misinformation that turned out to be correct and turned out to be right.

The misinformation that shut down was stuff that was opposed by the World Health Organization. So you also lose freedom when you have control going to one entity and they control the information that goes in and comes out at that point, you don't have medical freedom anymore. So there's a lot of unintended consequences that go with this, this thing. Now I think they're unintended consequences. It may be full well that Biden knows exactly what he's doing with this. But I think that the American people don't fully understand what's happening with this.

Well, I don't know if Biden knows full well what he's doing with this, but I think somebody is more cognizant, not sure Biden knows anything full well, right?

No, I mean, you guys are right. I mean, there's definitely an agenda somewhere to be pushing this and the way that we are as a nation anyway, and certainly as the Biden administration.

Well, Michelle's out there on the front lines. She's been talking to people. She went and observed these all of these gatherings, the amendments, all that kind of stuff.

And we'll get an update from Michelle Bachman. Stay with us, folks. You're listening to Walthover.

This is Tim Barton from Walthover with another moment from American history. In 1963, the United States Supreme Court decided that voluntary Bible reading could no longer be part of the school day.

Founding father Benjamin Rush, known as the father of public schools under the Constitution, pointedly warned that the Bible should be read in schools and preference to all other books.

...