More than a decade ago, 12 jurors in Orlando, Florida delivered a verdict that sent shockwaves

across the country.

In a packed courtroom, watched by millions, Casey Anthony was found not guilty of murdering

her two-year-old daughter.

For many, it felt impossible. For others, it was proof that the state

hadn't met its burden. But when the verdict was read, the story didn't end. Only the criminal

trial did, because in the years that followed, new pieces of this case continued to surface.

Digital evidence that jurors never heard about. Civil lawsuits filed by those who said

they were misled. Explosive affidavits from insiders. Convictions overturned on appeal. A new law

passed in Kaylee's name. Polygraph examinations. And eventually, Casey Anthony herself,

stepping back into the spotlight to tell her

version of what happened inside that house on June 16, 2008. So what did the jury not know? What was

discovered after the courtroom lights went dark? And if certain evidence had been presented,

would 12 jurors have decided differently?

Today, we're stepping beyond the verdict, beyond the headlines, and back into the details

that continue to divide a nation. The prosecution says she chose a social life over motherhood.

The defense says this was a tragic accident, covered up by a dysfunctional family.

But it's the jurors who have the final say.

This is the 13 juror podcast where we break down real court cases and put you in the jurors' seat.

Two sides, the same evidence.

You decide what to believe.

I'm your host, Brandy Churchwell.

...