meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Science Quickly

Better Data Could Mean Better Dating

Science Quickly

Scientific American

Science

4.41.4K Ratings

🗓️ 9 August 2018

⏱️ 2 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Both men and women tended to pursue mates just 25 percent more desirable than themselves—suggesting they are "optimistic realists." Christopher Intagliata reports. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is scientific American 60 second science. I'm Christopher Intagiyata.

0:07.0

Dating apps like Bumble and Tinder can help singles couple up.

0:11.0

But online dating, it's also great for scientists.

0:14.0

There's so much folk wisdom about dating and very little hard evidence.

0:20.0

Elizabeth Brooke is a computational social scientist at the University of Michigan.

0:24.4

She recently used online dating data to answer this question.

0:27.7

What does it mean for someone to be out of your league and is there a way that we can study

0:31.2

that using the techniques of network science.

0:34.1

Brooke and our colleague Mark Newman studied who swapped messages with whom on a popular online

0:38.8

dating platform in the month of January 2014.

0:42.3

They categorize users by desirability using page rank, one of the algorithms

0:46.5

behind search technology. Essentially, if you receive a dozen messages from desirable users, you

0:52.4

must be more desirable than someone who receives the same

0:55.0

number of messages from average users. And then they asked, how far out of their league do online

1:00.8

daters tend to go when pursuing a partner?

1:03.0

I think people are optimistic realists.

1:05.0

In other words, they found that both men and women

1:08.0

tended to pursue mates just 25% more desirable than themselves.

1:12.0

So they're being optimistic, but they're also taking into account

1:17.2

their own relative position within this overall desirability hierarchy.

1:21.4

All the graphs and charts are in the journal Science Advances.

1:25.0

And the study did have a few more lessons for people on the market.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Scientific American, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Scientific American and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.